Friday, February 15, 2008

Rocket Man

If you're looking for a professional review of what happened with Roger Clemens on Wednesday, go elsewhere. If you're looking for a smart lawyer who knows what legally happened at Clemens' hearing on Wednesday, keep searching. If you're looking for a not-so-intelligent opinion from a not-so-smart Boston sports fan who's in his 6th year of undergraduate at Bridgewater State College, then you've come to the right place.

I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the legal ramifications Roger Clemens or Brian McNamee could face, I'm just going to give my opinion of what I watched on Wednesday. And what I watched was an embarrassment. It's been two days since it was on, and I'm too lazy to look up stuff that happened, so don't mind me if I "misremembered" some of the details that took place.

I turned on the hearing about halfway through. From what I gathered, each congressman that was there had five minutes to grill either McNamee or Clemens. I saw things come from both angles. I saw one congressman think it was his own stand up comedy act, as he started making jokes and everyone was laughing.

I thought this was supposed to be some sort of serious hearing?

I also saw a woman, representing the state of New York, start her statement off by thanking Clemens for all the wonderful things he did on the field for the Yankee organization and off the field in the community.

What a joke.

Then, one congressman, at the end of his statement, proceeded to ask Roger what hat he was going to wear into the Hall of Fame.

It became laughable.

The one thing I do know, however, is that you can't tamper a witness (at least I think that's the phrase). I know this nanny was thrown under the proverbial bus by McNamee's vivid account. So vivid, in fact, at one point I thought he was reading from an old script he dug up from his days as an aspiring screenwriter in the porn industry.

But the bottom line is this nanny was supposed to be a key witness in this whole hearing. Knowing all this, Roger and his legal team went on to call her and invite her to his house. When this was brought up at the hearing, Roger claims he was "trying to help you guys out". Right. He was trying to get in touch with her for a cup of tea and not talk about the upcoming hearing so they could get their story straight.

The best part is, after he said he was trying to help congress out, the guy leading congress says "I understand you were trying to help us out, thank you". Thank you?!?! Come on now. If he was in a real courtroom, the judge would have looked at him and said "Mr. Clemens, if you ever obviously lie to me and try to embarrass me in my courtroom again, I will have you hung, is that understood?"

Meanwhile, you have Mr. McNamee. He sits there, gets badgered by Congress and Clemens, and sits there and takes it like a man. Doesn't ever get his back up, like Clemens and his legal team did. He just sits there calm, answers every question, and continues to cooperate. Doesn't break any rules outside of the hearing, and provides evidence as much as he can. Has he lied in the past? Of course, he admitted that. Would he make this up though? I don't think so.

Like I said, I'm not the brightest bulb to be writing about some sort of legal hearing. I'm the kid who failed a class titled Sexuality last semester, and I love sex! But I can give the average man's opinion on this whole matter. Roger Clemens has always been about himself, his whole career. He wanted the limelight, and he wanted it to be about himself. He was always bigger than the team. Now, his good friend, Andy Pettitte is against him, along with Chuck Knoblauch.

Once again, it's Roger all by himself. It's all about him now. This time, I couldn't be happier.

-BJal

1 comment:

Bruin1968 said...

I have ventured onto this site two or three times now and have yet to leave a comment. However, I feel like I would be doing the entire sports world (especially Boston Fans) a disservice not to comment on the incompetence of this website. Honestly, I don't know how I even came about the site, but it had a picture of the new- look celtics, so why not give it a try?

However, reading the first article "Shocked" I felt the insatiable feeling to call the Boston Herald and speak to Steve Buckley. Why, you might ask? Well, "Shocked" bears a striking resemblance to Buckley's article immediately following the superbowl. Plagerism is a very serious offense and should not be taken lightly even though this site does not have a major following as of yet.

And by looking at the site, drab as in may be, I would get the distinct feeling that this is a Boston based site. So why no Bruins? They on the verge of the playoffs and you guys are writing about "Rob Yundt v. Ricardo Almeida"?!?! Granted the Bruins are not a big draw in Boston as of late, but they shouldn't be left out in place of the mindless sport of ultimate fighting.

So today on my morning break, I logged in on Wi-fi at a coffee shop in Boston and visited barstoolsports.com. After reading what they had to say(aka the pictures), I said lets see what the guys over at the sports brief have to talk about today. Give you guys one more chance.

So I read "Rocket Man." Not once has there been a writer make so many excuses for lack of knowledge about a particular subject than the writer of this article. Each of the first two paragraphs were basically an explanation on why the "article" would not make any sense at all. And it didn't. It was run on, it was uninfomative, and most importantly, it wasn't even fun to read. If your not going to have any of the aforementioned traits, at least make it an enjoyable read for the bloggers.

And please don't respond with the whole "opinion" defense. Just because you are writing your opinions down on a website doesnt mean it has to be boring and lack substance.

I didn't intend for this to be a negative comment and please don't view it as such. Everyone should receive constructive criticism when they start something new with the hope of improving. Hopefully people respond to this and you can get a better feel on how everyone views this site. I will continue to read some articles looking for improvemants and comment as I deem necessary.

Bruin1968