Showing posts with label Minnesota Vikings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minnesota Vikings. Show all posts

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Besse's NFL Wild Card Picks

I'll start this blog by saying I'm as Even Steven as it gets when it comes to picking games. Like one of those assholes on Draftkings who uses formulas and programs to create 100 different lineups, I could submit 100 different sets of picks in a given NFL week and still go 8-8. It's how I roll. That being said, here are my picks for the 2016 season Wild Card weekend. All lines pulled from Sportsbook.ag, where I spend my money:

Chiefs at Texans (+3, O/U 39.5)
Some big news coming out this morning that Jadeveon Clowney wasn't activated by Bill O'Brien and ran out of the stadium like a chick who just got dumped. It's a big story, but it won't change my pick nor do I think it has an impact on the game.

The Chiefs come in on the heels of a 10-game winning streak, while the Texans won a shitty division whose other three teams won a total of 16 games. The Chiefs started the season 1-5, going 1-4 against current playoff teams. They only played two playoff teams during their 10-game streak, beating the Steelers at home vs. Landry Jones and the worst Peyton Manning we've ever seen. The Texans, meanwhile, went 1-3 vs. playoff teams. Conclusion: neither team has won nor proven shit. So how do we pick the game?

I'm leaning Texans for a few reasons:

  • They're at home
  • Bill O'Brien is a good coach whose managed to get quite a bit out of the team that had to start four different QB's this year, none of whom are all that great. Hoyer is the least worst.
  • Hopkins and Watt - both guys can change the game on their respective sides of the ball
  • Andy Reid - I'm convinced he'll fuck it up by mismanaging timeouts
Alex Smith has been solid this year and has a bunch of weapons, but I think the Texans D will either get to him or the Chiefs will dedicate so much attention to stopping Watt that they mute their own offense in the process. The Texans offense isn't great, but Hoyer can sling it to Hopkins all day and they've got a few guys in the backfield that can do some different things, change pace and get first downs. I like the Texans to cover at home in a close, low-scoring affair.

The pick: Texans +3, Under 39.5

Steelers at Bengals (+2.5, O/U 45.5)
The Bengals are starting A.J. Mccarron at quarterback and I think this is going to work out better for them. Not having Dalton removes the "can't win a primetime or playoff game" discussion and they can go in with nothing to lose except a playoff game for which they'll get a free pass anyway since they don't have their starting QB. It's a win/win even if they lose. 

Mccarron, meanwhile, is 2-1 in games he started (NOTE: Dalton sucked in the 33-20 loss to the Steelers before bowing out). And Mccarron's loss was at Denver on Monday night in OT. I think we've got a bit of a Brady/Bledsoe thing brewing - not to say he can take them all the way, b/c if they win today I maintain the Pats beat them next week anyway. But he's played well, has two really good RB's in Hill and Bernard, stud receiver in AJ Green and a solid TE option in Eifert. Plus the defense is excellent, they're at home, and Big Ben has been turnover prone in the last several weeks.

On the flip side, the Steelers offense is still explosive but a couple things working against them this week:
  • They're down to their 3rd and 4th options at RB. One guy whose name I don't know and am too lazy to look, and Todman whose name I only know because he's from Dartmouth, MA, just up the road from where I grew up.
  • Their defense sucks, so Mccarron can ball a bit
  • Turnovers - Big Ben has been trying to force it lately, and I think the Bengals' D can make him pay
The pick: Bengals +2.5, Under 45.5

Seahawks at Vikings (+4.5, O/U 39)
I've heard quite a few people opting to jump on the Vikings bandwagon the last few days and I'm just not buying it. Bridgewater sucks, so there's no reason the Seattle D can load up the box to stop Peterson and force him to try and take on their secondary. The receiving corp isn't anywhere near the level they need to be to compete with Sherman & Co. I look back at the 38-7 whitewashing by Seattle earlier this year and don't think that was necessarily a fluke.

Lynch being out doesn't necessarily worry me, either. This offense rides with Wilson and they've been lights out in the passing game. Christine Michael isn't a bum - he can bring some value in the running game and open things up for Wilson through the air. It's going to be cold AF out there, but I think all that'll do is prevent Seattle from hitting the 30's b/c of a couple dropped balls here and there. I've got them dominating this one pillar to post and riding off to the Divisional Round with a 24-10 win.

The pick: Seattle -4.5, Under 39

Packers at Redskins (-1, O/U 45.5)
I LOVE Cousins and the Redskins in this one. Won 4 straight to close the year and scored over 30 in three of the four games. That offense is rolling and is loaded with weapons, plus Sam Shields, the Packers top corner, is out. I think this really lends itself to Desean Jackson breaking a couple big plays, and Jordan Reed is going to be a handful for the Packers' D to handle. He's as good as it gets at the TE position right now. And Cousins, to his credit, finds anyone and everyone in that offense. Garcon and Crowder have been effective in the passing game, as well. 

The Packers come in reeling, and as bad as they've played there's always the fact they have Aaron Rodgers. But for Patriots' fans like myself, we all know that even when you have Da Gawd Tom Brady behind center, without any weapons even he can't win a Super Bowl on his own. You get steamrolled like they did at home against the Ravens back in 2010. I see this being a pretty close game throughout, with Rodgers getting a couple late chances to tie or win the game in the closing minutes but ultimately failing to convert and the Redskins holding serve at home and advancing to the next round.

The pick: Redskins -1, Over 45.5

-Besse

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Brett Favre: "Play For Yourself 1st, Team 2nd"


During the Minnesota Vikings press conference yesterday to address Randy Moss, I thought Brett Favre said something quite interesting, that surprisingly ESPN brushed right under the rug. Favre stated that players play first and foremost for themselves and secondly for the team. Doesn't that sum up Favre's entire career? I understand the greater point about having to play well to stay in the league and needing to look out for yourself, but as the quarterback and "leader" of the team, how can you say you put the team second?

Maybe no one is talking about his statement because it was so obvious. How else could one guy hold multiple teams hostage in the off season with should I or shouldn't I retirement talk. His team is 2-5 this year, he's tied for the league-lead in INTs with 11, he sent pictures of his thing to a reporter, and he went off the field in the fetal position on a stretcher after getting a cut on his chin.

The guy is a joke and the way he is covered is even more laughable. To bad the Vikings don't have a real quarterback on the bench or there actually could be a chance he gets benched. Instead, Minnesota fans can enjoy 9 more games where he will run and jump like a Pop Warner players throwing his 1st TD when he completes a long pass or a guy limping off the field trying to hold his body together with the fear an appendage could fall off at any moment after he tosses another pick.

Also, I looked for the clip of him saying play for the individual first, but shockingly I couldn't find it on youtube, only his comments on Moss. How could no one else think it was a big deal? Maybe everyone is used to it?


-Keefe

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Straight Cash Homey


The Pats have moved on from the 2nd best WR in the history of football. Randy Moss is in the final year of his 3yr/$27 million deal, and the trade between New England and Minnesota is all but complete. The Patriots will receive a 3rd round pick in 2011.

Career Touchdowns:

Moss: 151

Welker, Tate, Edelman, Hernandez, Gronkowski, Slater combined: 22

What? Great.

This is similar, but different, to when the Red Sox dealt Manny Ramirez. Sure the locker room might be better (I'm not convinced Moss was a huge disruption), but your on-field talent is comically weaken.

I had the Pats winning the AFC East with Moss. Now? They will be lucky to win the Wild Card. The defense sucks and the offense is now barely above average.

Celtics and Bruins coming right up!

-Keefe

Sunday, October 11, 2009

BJal's Lock du Jour - Sunday, October 11

After I saw that BJal won yesterday's Va Tech pick, I couldn't help but think about the lockerroom speech he must be giving today. It has to be reminiscent of Lou Brown in Major League...

"Ok, guys. We've won two games in a row. If we win tonight, its called a winning streak. IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE."

Let's be honest, even after winning a couple in a row, he's been so bad he can't honestly believe this is anything more than a stroke of luck. Today he's going with the Rams (+10.5) over the Vikings. Jimmy the Greek is taking the Vikings, and I trust the Greek. But hey you never know. It has happened before.

By the way, I woke up this morning and panicked because I didn't have BJal's lock du jour for today. Then he texted me a minute later and I felt relieved. That can't be good.

BJal's lock du jour: Rams (+10.5) over Vikings
Overall: 2-3

-Bess