Showing posts with label Washington Redskins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Redskins. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2016

Josh Norman Signs with Redskins

The Carolina Panthers made a huge mistake by taking the franchise tag off of CB Josh Norman.  Now the best (probably the best, Top 3 at least) corner in the game is on the move, to Washington.  He now gets to face his pal Odell Beckham Jr. twice a year...



I really hope this comes back to bite the Panthers.  What a stupid mistake.  However, do the Skins ever make any good moves?

Albert Haynesworth?
Antwaan Randle El?
Deion Sanders?
Jeff George?
Brandon Meriweather?
Adam Archuleta?

I'm sure there's a couple in there somewhere.  But I am a Norman fan, rooting for him.

According to reports he cashed in too: 5 years, $75 million.  (Not sure on guaranteed $)

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Besse's NFL Wild Card Picks

I'll start this blog by saying I'm as Even Steven as it gets when it comes to picking games. Like one of those assholes on Draftkings who uses formulas and programs to create 100 different lineups, I could submit 100 different sets of picks in a given NFL week and still go 8-8. It's how I roll. That being said, here are my picks for the 2016 season Wild Card weekend. All lines pulled from Sportsbook.ag, where I spend my money:

Chiefs at Texans (+3, O/U 39.5)
Some big news coming out this morning that Jadeveon Clowney wasn't activated by Bill O'Brien and ran out of the stadium like a chick who just got dumped. It's a big story, but it won't change my pick nor do I think it has an impact on the game.

The Chiefs come in on the heels of a 10-game winning streak, while the Texans won a shitty division whose other three teams won a total of 16 games. The Chiefs started the season 1-5, going 1-4 against current playoff teams. They only played two playoff teams during their 10-game streak, beating the Steelers at home vs. Landry Jones and the worst Peyton Manning we've ever seen. The Texans, meanwhile, went 1-3 vs. playoff teams. Conclusion: neither team has won nor proven shit. So how do we pick the game?

I'm leaning Texans for a few reasons:

  • They're at home
  • Bill O'Brien is a good coach whose managed to get quite a bit out of the team that had to start four different QB's this year, none of whom are all that great. Hoyer is the least worst.
  • Hopkins and Watt - both guys can change the game on their respective sides of the ball
  • Andy Reid - I'm convinced he'll fuck it up by mismanaging timeouts
Alex Smith has been solid this year and has a bunch of weapons, but I think the Texans D will either get to him or the Chiefs will dedicate so much attention to stopping Watt that they mute their own offense in the process. The Texans offense isn't great, but Hoyer can sling it to Hopkins all day and they've got a few guys in the backfield that can do some different things, change pace and get first downs. I like the Texans to cover at home in a close, low-scoring affair.

The pick: Texans +3, Under 39.5

Steelers at Bengals (+2.5, O/U 45.5)
The Bengals are starting A.J. Mccarron at quarterback and I think this is going to work out better for them. Not having Dalton removes the "can't win a primetime or playoff game" discussion and they can go in with nothing to lose except a playoff game for which they'll get a free pass anyway since they don't have their starting QB. It's a win/win even if they lose. 

Mccarron, meanwhile, is 2-1 in games he started (NOTE: Dalton sucked in the 33-20 loss to the Steelers before bowing out). And Mccarron's loss was at Denver on Monday night in OT. I think we've got a bit of a Brady/Bledsoe thing brewing - not to say he can take them all the way, b/c if they win today I maintain the Pats beat them next week anyway. But he's played well, has two really good RB's in Hill and Bernard, stud receiver in AJ Green and a solid TE option in Eifert. Plus the defense is excellent, they're at home, and Big Ben has been turnover prone in the last several weeks.

On the flip side, the Steelers offense is still explosive but a couple things working against them this week:
  • They're down to their 3rd and 4th options at RB. One guy whose name I don't know and am too lazy to look, and Todman whose name I only know because he's from Dartmouth, MA, just up the road from where I grew up.
  • Their defense sucks, so Mccarron can ball a bit
  • Turnovers - Big Ben has been trying to force it lately, and I think the Bengals' D can make him pay
The pick: Bengals +2.5, Under 45.5

Seahawks at Vikings (+4.5, O/U 39)
I've heard quite a few people opting to jump on the Vikings bandwagon the last few days and I'm just not buying it. Bridgewater sucks, so there's no reason the Seattle D can load up the box to stop Peterson and force him to try and take on their secondary. The receiving corp isn't anywhere near the level they need to be to compete with Sherman & Co. I look back at the 38-7 whitewashing by Seattle earlier this year and don't think that was necessarily a fluke.

Lynch being out doesn't necessarily worry me, either. This offense rides with Wilson and they've been lights out in the passing game. Christine Michael isn't a bum - he can bring some value in the running game and open things up for Wilson through the air. It's going to be cold AF out there, but I think all that'll do is prevent Seattle from hitting the 30's b/c of a couple dropped balls here and there. I've got them dominating this one pillar to post and riding off to the Divisional Round with a 24-10 win.

The pick: Seattle -4.5, Under 39

Packers at Redskins (-1, O/U 45.5)
I LOVE Cousins and the Redskins in this one. Won 4 straight to close the year and scored over 30 in three of the four games. That offense is rolling and is loaded with weapons, plus Sam Shields, the Packers top corner, is out. I think this really lends itself to Desean Jackson breaking a couple big plays, and Jordan Reed is going to be a handful for the Packers' D to handle. He's as good as it gets at the TE position right now. And Cousins, to his credit, finds anyone and everyone in that offense. Garcon and Crowder have been effective in the passing game, as well. 

The Packers come in reeling, and as bad as they've played there's always the fact they have Aaron Rodgers. But for Patriots' fans like myself, we all know that even when you have Da Gawd Tom Brady behind center, without any weapons even he can't win a Super Bowl on his own. You get steamrolled like they did at home against the Ravens back in 2010. I see this being a pretty close game throughout, with Rodgers getting a couple late chances to tie or win the game in the closing minutes but ultimately failing to convert and the Redskins holding serve at home and advancing to the next round.

The pick: Redskins -1, Over 45.5

-Besse

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Trying to understand the Colts and Redskins

Update 3/11/12, 11:39am: According to ESPN's dynamic duo of Chris Mortensen and Adam Schefter, sources close to Manning say he's narrowed his choices to Denver and Arizona. Suprised that Miami isn't a bigger contender, but Denver would be interesting. Catch the story here: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7672173/2012-free-agency-peyton-manning-favors-denver-broncos-arizona-cardinals-sources-say

As I sit here on Sunday morning in San Francisco, watching golf and waiting for this brief bout with constipation to end, I thought it was the perfect time to sum up some thoughts from conversations with folks this week regarding the Colts and Redskins and their bold moves in recent days.

At face value, a lot of people questioned the moves by both teams - the Colts releasing 14-year veteran and arguably the greatest QB of his era, Peyton manning, and the Redskins trading three 1st rounds picks (2012 - 2014) and a 2nd-round pick to move up four spots in the 2012 draft for RG3. I'm here to tell you why I agree with the Colts decision and disagree with the Redskins, and why I find the timing of both moves ironic. I'll start with the Colts.

I get why a lot of people think it's a stupid move. Manning is one of the best in the game, has been the QB for the last 14 years, and their now banking on Andrew Luck being their (successful) franchise QB for the next 10-15 seasons. It's a huge risk. Luck isn't a lock. He hasn't taken an NFL snap. And aside from his neck, which has been medically cleared by doctors, there's no reason to think Manning's skills have diminished.

But let's not forget that the Colts were on the hook for $28 million with Manning. And that was just a one-year option. He turns 36 this year, and while he could easily play into his 40's, you just don't know. Yet 15 years ago, the Colts were coming on a 3-13 season, in need of a franchise QB. They selected Manning as their man. And while they easily could have stuck with Manning to remain competitive in the next few years, look at what's around him. He doesn't have a great backfield anymore - Addai can't stay healthy and productive, the other guys suck - and the defense is getting old and remains unreliable. It was the perfect time to clean house, start over, and rebuild like they did 15 years ago. Manning went 3-13 in his first year, then 13-3 in 1999 after the Colts trade Marshall Faulk to the Rams and drafted Edgerrin James in the 1st round. Not to say Luck will follow a similar path, but the Colts now will have their QB at a much lower price, especially given the rookie salary cap in place, and can begin their rebuilding process. You have to believe they'll have a high pick in 2013, so they can add another important piece, such as a top-flight RB, to help compliment Luck in 2013 and beyond.

Meanwhile, I think the best spot for Manning is naturally Miami. He lives there in the offseason and will have some great weapons around him with Brandon Marshall and Davone Bess at WR, and Reggie Bush and Daniel Thomas in the backfield. The Dolphins lack a legit TE weapon, an asset Manning has always enjoyed having, but perhaps he'll make a guy like Anthony Fasano better than what he's been.

The Broncos and Cardinals are also interesting choices. Denver could bring in Manning and instantly become a Super Bowl contender. The team made the AFC Divisional playoffs with a brutal offense under Tim Tebow. The Broncos are built on defense. But with Manning at QB, that team suddenly becomes well-rounded with the ability to produce proficiently on both sides of the ball. And in the long-term, Tebow can learn from one of the greats for a few years, grow as a QB, then move back under center when Manning moves on. At that point, you have to believe given Tebow's work ethic and penchant for winning, that he'll become a legitimate threat on the ground and through the air that can keep a winning tradition in Denver once Manning moves on.

For the Cardinals, Manning would give Larry Fitzgerald a competent human being to throw him the ball. Fitz is the best WR in the game, hands down (or up, however you want to look at it). Beanie Wells can run the rock, and that would be a nice trio competing in the NFC West. While the emergence of the 49ers makes that division more competitive, it's still up for the taking.

I think the decision by the Colts was a bold one, but it benefits the franchise, Manning, and the NFL in the long run. The Colts can rebuild, Manning can start fresh and finish his career with a team he hand picks, make them a contender, and bring hope to that franchise while shifting the axis of power in the NFL. Chances are, the AFC or NFC will have a new team competing at the top of the heap that hasn't been there in some time. The Dolphins, Broncos and Cardinals all fit the mold.

That's where I find the Redskins situation an interesting one. Was this team not the perfect fit to court Manning? Rex freaking Grossman was the quarterback. Disgusting. Why not sign Manning, albeit for $28 million, put him in the same division as Eli, ride him for a few years and grab a young QB that you can season under his leadership to take over when he's done? Instead, they've traded 2012 draft picks with the Rams, given them their 1st round picks in 2013 and 2014 and a 2nd rounder in there just to draft RG3. In that division, he's probably not going to find consistent success for a few years when he's seasoned and groomed. Even Cam Newton, perhaps the best young, talented QB in the NFL right now, isn't finding consistently winning to be easy in the NFL. Yet the Redskins can't use draft picks in the next couple years to add any pieces around RG3. Why do you ask? Because they traded them away!

Meanwhile, the Rams should be expelled from the NFL if they aren't winning by 2015. If you can't make it work with all those 1st round picks you have now, that's just awful.

Alright I'm done. Still constipated.

-Bess